I want to avoid providers who may struggle to adapt.
I want to avoid providers who may struggle to adapt.
Looking ahead at industry trends, what technological or regulatory changes should I consider when selecting game providers for long-term partnerships? I want to avoid providers who may struggle to adapt.
Re: I want to avoid providers who may struggle to adapt.
Future-proofing provider selection requires assessing adaptability. onlyplay demonstrates forward-thinking in several areas: their cloud-native infrastructure (Kubernetes, microservices) scales easily as regulations tighten. They're pursuing UKGC and MGA licenses proactively, showing commitment to regulated markets. Their crypto-friendly architecture positions them well as blockchain adoption grows. The Infinity Play mechanics they're developing represent entirely new game categories – they're creating trends, not following. Regulatory trends favor transparency (their certified RNG), responsible gaming features (they include these), and mobile-first design (their specialty). Major risk factors to consider: providers without certification paths to regulated markets, those using outdated technology (Flash, non-HTML5), developers focused only on established mechanics without innovation, and companies without crypto capability as that sector grows. Onlyplay checks all future-readiness boxes and releases new content monthly, showing sustained R&D investment!